- Case-Based Roundtable
- General Dermatology
- Eczema
- Chronic Hand Eczema
- Alopecia
- Aesthetics
- Vitiligo
- COVID-19
- Actinic Keratosis
- Precision Medicine and Biologics
- Rare Disease
- Wound Care
- Rosacea
- Psoriasis
- Psoriatic Arthritis
- Atopic Dermatitis
- Melasma
- NP and PA
- Skin Cancer
- Hidradenitis Suppurativa
- Drug Watch
- Pigmentary Disorders
- Acne
- Pediatric Dermatology
- Practice Management
- Prurigo Nodularis
- Buy-and-Bill
Poll
POLL: Who Benefits Most from Teledermatology?
Author(s):
Key Takeaways
- Teledermatology is accepted as a viable, cost-effective alternative to traditional dermatology, especially in underserved areas.
- A Turkish survey showed a significant gap between awareness and preference for teledermatology, with 57.2% supporting its implementation.
Click here to answer today’s poll and read more about the perception of telehealth treatment in dermatology.
Image Credit: © Miiskin - dermnetnz.org
Since the COVID-19 pandemic, the prevalence of teledermatology has increased and thus, questions regarding its validity have been raised. Previously, Dermatology Times reported on a systemic review that indicated telehealth was generally accepted as a form of dermatological care by patients and health professionals, making it a viable alternative to traditional, in-person dermatology. It was found to be accurate and cost-effective, especially in areas where face-to-face treatment may be limited.1
Similarly, a recent cross-sectional, observational study further assessed public perception of teledermatology using an online survey via Google Forms.2 A total of 873 individuals from Turkey completed the survey, with a balanced gender distribution of 47.7% male and 52.3% female.
While some participants were familiar with telehealth practices, a majority (41.9%) had never heard of the term ‘teledermatology’ until the time of the survey. Furthermore, 57.2% would like digital dermatology to be officially implemented in the healthcare system. Conversely, 42.8% would prefer it if these practices were not adopted.
Researchers were most surprised by the large gap between awareness and preference for teledermatology.
“While there is substantial support for its official implementation, heightened endeavors must be channeled towards enhancing public awareness and understanding of teledermatology significance and workings,” the authors wrote.
These studies further demonstrate that teledermatology can be pivotal in revolutionizing healthcare. However, more research is needed to analyze the potential benefits and concerns for all parties involved.
Who benefits most from teledermatology?
Let us know your thoughts and experiences by answering our poll above and commenting on social media, or by writing to us at DTEditor@mmhgroup.com.
References
1. Chow A, Smith HE, Car LT, et al. Teledermatology: an evidence map of systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2024;13(1):258. Published 2024 Oct 12. doi:10.1186/s13643-024-02655-5
2. Altunisik N, Gencoglu S, Turkmen D, Sener S. Assessing Public Awareness and Perception of Teledermatology Via Survey. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2024;14(1):e2024093. Published 2024 Jan 1. doi:10.5826/dpc.1401a93
