News
Article
Dermatology Times
Author(s):
In LEVEL-UP, upadacitinib demonstrated superiority over dupilumab in achieving EASI-90 and little to no itch at week 16.
AbbVie recently announced new topline data from its phase 3b/4 study, LEVEL-UP (NCT05601882), an open-label, efficacy assessor-blinded head-to-head study evaluating the safety and efficacy of upadacitinib 15mg once daily (Rinvoq) compared to dupilumab (Dupixent; Sanofi and Regeneron) in adolescent and adult patients with moderate to severe AD who had inadequate responses to systemic therapies or who should not use systemic therapies.
Upadacitinib demonstrated superior efficacy compared to dupilumab in the primary end point of the simultaneous achievement of a 90% or greater reduction in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-90) and a Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale of 0 or 1 (WP-NRS 0/1) at week 16. Overall, 19.9% of patients treated with upadacitinib achieved the primary end point and 8.9% of patients treated with dupilumab achieved the primary end point.
"Too many patients are still not achieving optimal disease control in atopic dermatitis despite taking steps to manage their condition. Results from the LEVEL UP study highlight how treatment options such as upadacitinib can achieve high treatment goals in atopic dermatitis with combined measures of EASI 90 and NRS 0/1, not just itch resolution or just skin clearance,” said Jonathan Silverberg, MD, PhD, MPH, professor of dermatology and director of clinical research at the George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences and lead study investigator, in the news release.
Additionally, upadacitinib demonstrated superiority compared to dupilumab in all ranked secondary end points, including the rapid onset of achieving near complete skin clearance and little to no itch. Other secondary end points included 40.8% of patients treated with upadacitinib achieved EASI-90 at week 16 compared to 22.5% of patients treated with dupilumab, and 30.2% of patients treated with upadacitinib achieved a WP-NRS of 0 or 1 at week 16 compared to 15.5% of patients treated with dupilumab.
"Even while receiving conventional treatments, many patients with atopic dermatitis still continue to live with significant itch and inflammatory skin symptoms that can profoundly impact their everyday lives. Results from this study show that patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis can strive for both little to no itch and clearer skin,” said Roopal Thakkar, MD, senior vice president and chief medical officer of global therapeutics at AbbVie, in the news release.
LEVEL-UP is the first head-to-head trial in atopic dermatitis evaluating upadacitinib beginning at 15 mg daily compared to dupilumab and its labeled dose. Upadacitinib was first dosed in adult and adolescent patients aged 12 years and older and weighing at least 40 kg at 15 mg once a day, and then increased to 30 mg once a day based on their clinical response. Dupilumab was first dosed at 600 mg, followed by 300 mg every other week in adult and adolescent patients weighing at least 60 kg. Any adolescent patients who weighed less than 60 kg received a first dose of 400 mg, followed by 200 mg every other week.
Upadacitinib’s safety profile was consistent with previous atopic dermatitis studies and no new safety signals were identified in LEVEL-UP. During the first 16 weeks, the most common adverse events were nasopharyngitis for both the upadacitinib and dupilumab patient groups. No malignancies, adjudicated major adverse cardiac events, adjudicated venous thromboembolic events, or treatment-emergent deaths were reported in either patient group.
According to the announcement, AbbVie plans to present the results from LEVEL-UP at a future medical congress.
Dermatology Times: In your opinion, what is the significance of a head-to-head study evaluating 2 major therapeutics in the atopic dermatitis space?
Silverberg: We saw in the LEVEL UP study that upadacitinib demonstrated superiority over dupilumab across primary and all secondary endpoints, meeting these more stringent treatment targets, which is very promising for the AD patient population when it comes to disease control. What’s unique about LEVEL UP is that it evaluates simultaneous achievement of near complete skin clearance, and little to no itch in adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. So, patients in this study needed to achieve both measures to meet the primary endpoint, not just one, making this study really reach for how we might define high-level disease control for moderate-to-severe AD.
Dermatology Times: Based on this news of upadacitinib’s superiority over dupilumab, what key points should dermatologists be aware of and take back to their practice considerations when selecting a therapeutic for their patients?
Silverberg: There has been a transformative evolution in the atopic dermatitis treatment landscape. The LEVEL UP data demonstrate next-level disease control with the simultaneous achievement of both no to little itch (NRS 0/1) and near complete skin clearance (EASI 90). For years we have accepted EASI 75 as the treatment target, but these data show that we can aim higher. There remain many patients with unmet needs in atopic dermatitis, so these results are very promising for using upadacitinib to help reach optimized clinical outcomes.
Reference
New data show Rinvoq (upadacitinib) demonstrated superiority versus Dupixent (dupilumab) across primary and all secondary endpoints in an open-label head-to-head atopic dermatitis study. News release. AbbVie. April 25, 2024. Accessed April 25, 2024. https://news.abbvie.com/2024-04-25-New-Data-Show-RINVOQ-R-upadacitinib-Demonstrated-Superiority-Versus-DUPIXENT-R-dupilumab-Across-Primary-and-All-Secondary-Endpoints-in-an-Open-Label-Head-to-Head-Atopic-Dermatitis-Study