- Acne
- Actinic Keratosis
- Aesthetics
- Alopecia
- Atopic Dermatitis
- Buy-and-Bill
- COVID-19
- Case-Based Roundtable
- Chronic Hand Eczema
- Drug Watch
- Eczema
- General Dermatology
- Hidradenitis Suppurativa
- Melasma
- NP and PA
- Pediatric Dermatology
- Pigmentary Disorders
- Practice Management
- Precision Medicine and Biologics
- Prurigo Nodularis
- Psoriasis
- Psoriatic Arthritis
- Rare Disease
- Rosacea
- Skin Cancer
- Vitiligo
- Wound Care
Opinion
Video
Insights for Clinicians: Leveraging Real-World Data for Informed Practice
Author(s):
Lawrence Eichenfield, MD, discusses the numerous limitations of current topical treatments for atopic dermatitis (AD), their impact on patient management, adherence, and quality of life, the common obstacles patients face in achieving adequate disease control with these therapies, and compares ruxolitinib cream as a nonsteroidal monotherapy alternative.
1. Please discuss the limitations of current topical treatments for atopic dermatitis (AD), and in your view, how do these limitations impact patient management and QoL (Quality of Life)?
2. Can you describe the challenges faced by patients with AD in achieving adequate disease control with topical therapies?
3. How do non-steroidal formulations contribute to AD management, and what are their benefits?
4. Could you elaborate on the available topical therapy options and discuss the potential advantages they offer to patients?
5. What is the significance of ruxolitinib cream as a nonsteroidal monotherapy in the treatment of mild to moderate AD, especially considering the limitations of existing therapies?
